Skip to content

Conversation

davmac314
Copy link
Contributor

A numeric or boolean template argument in a partial specialisation needs to be resolved, which isn't currently being handled.

@davmac314
Copy link
Contributor Author

License check appears to have failed due to a network or transient error?

@i-garrison
Copy link
Contributor

I confirm this change is valid and fixes the issue indicated.

@jonahgraham jonahgraham added the language C/C++ Language Support label Oct 8, 2025
A numeric or boolean template argument in a partial specialisation needs
to be resolved, which isn't currently being handled.
@jonahgraham jonahgraham force-pushed the improve-partial-specialisation branch from cafd51f to 0ebbd0e Compare October 14, 2025 17:02
@jonahgraham jonahgraham merged commit 0ebbd0e into eclipse-cdt:main Oct 14, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@jonahgraham
Copy link
Member

@davmac314 Thank you for your contribution and @i-garrison thank you for reviewing it. I am merging this under the special review policy. As I am in the middle of handling many of these PRs at once, I have done the build and test of them all in #1356 and I am applying the changes back to this PR so that it is tracked properly.

@jonahgraham jonahgraham added this to the 12.3.0 milestone Oct 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

language C/C++ Language Support

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Primitive template arguments not evaluated when matching partial specialisation

3 participants